Bug 4493

Summary: Mime Icons column is hidden when window is shrunk to certain size
Product: Claws Mail Reporter: Keith Edmunds <kae>
Component: UI/Message ViewAssignee: users
Status: NEW ---    
Severity: trivial    
Priority: P3    
Version: 4.0.0   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Linux   
Attachments: Claws window 1530px wide

Description Keith Edmunds 2021-07-05 12:17:49 UTC
Created attachment 2217 [details]
Claws window 1530px wide

If I make the Claws window narrower than about 1540px, the RHS side data (message parts, quick search bar, etc) starts being obscured. Screenshot showing window of 1530px width.

Maybe this is a user setup problem, but if it is I can't find what's causing it.

Result is a window significantly wider than I want. There's also a lot of wasted space in the message view.
Comment 1 Paul 2021-07-05 12:52:01 UTC
the problem only seems to occur when there is a (x-)Face header displayed.
Comment 2 Keith Edmunds 2021-07-05 14:45:04 UTC
I don't know what x-Face is, but I see this problem with every mail, even plain text ones. For example, I see it with the notification from Bugzilla, which presumably doesn't include x-face.
Comment 3 Paul 2021-07-05 14:49:50 UTC
what version are you actually using? (The version displayed in your screen shot is not an official version, 3.99.0git153 does not exist!)
Comment 4 Paul 2021-07-05 14:54:22 UTC
Hmm, you are using the experimental gtk3tree branch. Anyway, this bug is not specific to that.
Comment 5 Keith Edmunds 2021-07-05 14:57:17 UTC
I haven't changed what is displayed in the window header.

Version:
commit 5b7d96bcf4455c19e18a6e7977fdb051ffcf982c (HEAD -> gtk3tree, origin/gtk3tree)
Author: Thorsten Maerz <info@netztorte.de>
Date:   Sat Jun 26 09:00:06 2021 +0200

    Expand tree before selecting a node (Bug 4490)
    
    Selecting a collapsed tree node does not work,
    it needs to be expanded first.
    https://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4490
Comment 6 Paul 2021-07-05 15:07:27 UTC
(In reply to Keith Edmunds from comment #5)
See comment #4